16610lv jf site forum.replica-watch.info | (QC) JF 16610LV with no rehaut engraving by Intime : r/RepTime 16610lv jf site forum.replica-watch.info 342K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers.
Description. ORIGINAL ROLEX OYSTER PERPETUAL DATE 15200 BLACK ROMAN NUMERALS WHITE DIAL STAINLESS STEEL watch, made in 1990’s. The watch is in a fully working order and is in good vintage condition.
0 · info 16610LV dial
1 · [SOLD] Rolex Submariner 16610LV JF
2 · Rolex 16610lv
3 · QC for JF 16610LV. Triangle misaligned? : r/RepTime
4 · NEW RAF 16610LN and 16610LV : r/RepTime
5 · Kermit 16610LV Comparison: ARF vs. JF. vs. BP
6 · JF 16610LV vs. Gen early 16610 (orginally thought a 16800)
7 · Comparison 16610LV GEN vs JF
8 · 16610lv JF vs. Gen z
9 · (QC) JF 16610LV with no rehaut engraving by Intime : r/RepTime
The reference 16800 Submariner was first released in 1978 as an update to the reference 1680. It remained in production for a full decade until it was later replaced by the .
#1. As the title says I finally managed to take some pictures and compare my jf 16610lv to my gen 16610lv z-series. I will let the pictures speak for the most part of this review. Let's start with the insert (top is gen): 1 - gen z-series insert / 2- jf insert / 3 - brand new insert from 2017: Middle is jf the lower and upper insert are gen: I now took it from my drower and now It's on sale for a new owner who loves 5 digits Rolex sport models. All of you know the quality of the first JF, never reached by modern ARF or RAF. The watch is is good condition (do not expect a like new watch), with all the scratches and lines as a daily watch should have. In the upcoming weeks I will try to do a 1 to 1 comparison between GEN vs JF of the 16610LV (so called Kermit) For this purpose i decided to make use of the latest model with the rehaut engraving on both models. First of all, the 16610LV is one of my favorite watches from RLX of all time. Hence when this came out I right away placed an order. Between here and RWI there is some turmoil about what RAF is and if this watches are just bin parts from ARF.
On to the comparative photos. This 16800 is very aged, the bezel notches are smoother than the 16610 due to wear over time: The rehaut is the same depth, making a sanded and polished 16610 rehaut a legit option. The 16800 bracelet is slightly more polished due to .
342K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers.
14 votes, 16 comments. 382K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading.From my research, JF and ARF is the same factory and the main difference here is that ARF uses 904L and JF uses 316L steel. I suspect anyone looking for a 5-digit would want to franken it. In which case, you can pick up an ARF as your base.
A buddy is looking at this for a purchase. While I know Omega, this does not look right. The hands seem off, both size and arrangement in the center of. info 16610LV dial - REQUEST INFO FROM EXPERTS There are many variations on dials. If Rolex confirmed you the watch is an 16610LV by serial number would not be concerned IF you already bought the seller #1. As the title says I finally managed to take some pictures and compare my jf 16610lv to my gen 16610lv z-series. I will let the pictures speak for the most part of this review. Let's start with the insert (top is gen): 1 - gen z-series insert / 2- jf insert / 3 - brand new insert from 2017: Middle is jf the lower and upper insert are gen:
I now took it from my drower and now It's on sale for a new owner who loves 5 digits Rolex sport models. All of you know the quality of the first JF, never reached by modern ARF or RAF. The watch is is good condition (do not expect a like new watch), with all the scratches and lines as a daily watch should have. In the upcoming weeks I will try to do a 1 to 1 comparison between GEN vs JF of the 16610LV (so called Kermit) For this purpose i decided to make use of the latest model with the rehaut engraving on both models. First of all, the 16610LV is one of my favorite watches from RLX of all time. Hence when this came out I right away placed an order. Between here and RWI there is some turmoil about what RAF is and if this watches are just bin parts from ARF. On to the comparative photos. This 16800 is very aged, the bezel notches are smoother than the 16610 due to wear over time: The rehaut is the same depth, making a sanded and polished 16610 rehaut a legit option. The 16800 bracelet is slightly more polished due to .
342K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers.14 votes, 16 comments. 382K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading.
From my research, JF and ARF is the same factory and the main difference here is that ARF uses 904L and JF uses 316L steel. I suspect anyone looking for a 5-digit would want to franken it. In which case, you can pick up an ARF as your base.
A buddy is looking at this for a purchase. While I know Omega, this does not look right. The hands seem off, both size and arrangement in the center of.
info 16610LV dial - REQUEST INFO FROM EXPERTS There are many variations on dials. If Rolex confirmed you the watch is an 16610LV by serial number would not be concerned IF you already bought the seller #1. As the title says I finally managed to take some pictures and compare my jf 16610lv to my gen 16610lv z-series. I will let the pictures speak for the most part of this review. Let's start with the insert (top is gen): 1 - gen z-series insert / 2- jf insert / 3 - brand new insert from 2017: Middle is jf the lower and upper insert are gen:
rolex trade up
I now took it from my drower and now It's on sale for a new owner who loves 5 digits Rolex sport models. All of you know the quality of the first JF, never reached by modern ARF or RAF. The watch is is good condition (do not expect a like new watch), with all the scratches and lines as a daily watch should have. In the upcoming weeks I will try to do a 1 to 1 comparison between GEN vs JF of the 16610LV (so called Kermit) For this purpose i decided to make use of the latest model with the rehaut engraving on both models.
First of all, the 16610LV is one of my favorite watches from RLX of all time. Hence when this came out I right away placed an order. Between here and RWI there is some turmoil about what RAF is and if this watches are just bin parts from ARF. On to the comparative photos. This 16800 is very aged, the bezel notches are smoother than the 16610 due to wear over time: The rehaut is the same depth, making a sanded and polished 16610 rehaut a legit option. The 16800 bracelet is slightly more polished due to . 342K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading, no trusted dealers.14 votes, 16 comments. 382K subscribers in the RepTime community. The dedicated place for all discussions on replica watches. No selling or trading.
From my research, JF and ARF is the same factory and the main difference here is that ARF uses 904L and JF uses 316L steel. I suspect anyone looking for a 5-digit would want to franken it. In which case, you can pick up an ARF as your base. A buddy is looking at this for a purchase. While I know Omega, this does not look right. The hands seem off, both size and arrangement in the center of.
info 16610LV dial
rolex symbol text
rolex submariner oyster 41 mm edelstahl oystersteel
rolex submariner stahl gold 41mm
rolex triplock crown
$10K+
16610lv jf site forum.replica-watch.info|(QC) JF 16610LV with no rehaut engraving by Intime : r/RepTime
